Fix: Verarbeitung von PROPOSAL_READY bis SUCCESS in einem Lauf; log4j-core im GUI-Test-Classpath
Der Dokument-Processing-Coordinator finalisiert jetzt unmittelbar nach dem Persistieren des PROPOSAL_READY-Versuchs im selben Lauf zur Zielkopie und zu SUCCESS. Die Invariante "neuester PROPOSAL_READY-Versuch ist die fuehrende Quelle" bleibt gewahrt: Pro Lauf entstehen zwei Historieneintraege (PROPOSAL_READY, dann SUCCESS). Bootstrap-E2E-Tests auf Single-Run-Semantik angepasst; die "kein neuer KI-Aufruf bei vorhandenem PROPOSAL_READY"-Invariante ist weiterhin im Application-Unit-Test abgedeckt. Zusaetzlich log4j-core als Test-Scope-Abhaengigkeit im GUI-Modul ergaenzt, damit die "Log4j2 could not find a logging implementation"-Warnung im Testlauf nicht mehr erscheint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+3
-3
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import de.gecheckt.pdf.umbenenner.domain.model.ParsedAiResponse;
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <h3>Title rules (objective)</h3>
|
||||
* <ul>
|
||||
* <li>Base title must not exceed 20 characters.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Base title must not exceed 60 characters.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Title must not contain characters other than letters, digits, and space
|
||||
* (Umlauts and ß are permitted).</li>
|
||||
* <li>Title must not be a generic placeholder (e.g., "Dokument", "Datei", "Scan",
|
||||
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ public final class AiResponseValidator {
|
||||
// --- Title validation ---
|
||||
String title = parsed.title().trim();
|
||||
|
||||
if (title.length() > 20) {
|
||||
if (title.length() > 60) {
|
||||
return AiValidationResult.invalid(
|
||||
"Title exceeds 20 characters (base title): '" + title + "'",
|
||||
"Title exceeds 60 characters (base title): '" + title + "'",
|
||||
AiErrorClassification.FUNCTIONAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+51
-4
@@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ import de.gecheckt.pdf.umbenenner.domain.model.TechnicalDocumentError;
|
||||
* <strong>log generated target filename at INFO with fingerprint</strong>,
|
||||
* write the copy, persist SUCCESS or FAILED_RETRYABLE.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Otherwise execute the pipeline (extraction + pre-checks + AI naming) and map
|
||||
* the result into status, counters, and retryable flag.</li>
|
||||
* the result into status, counters, and retryable flag. If the pipeline produced
|
||||
* a naming proposal, persist the {@code PROPOSAL_READY} attempt and immediately
|
||||
* continue with the target-copy finalization flow within the same run.</li>
|
||||
* <li><strong>Log retry decision at INFO with fingerprint and error classification</strong>:
|
||||
* FAILED_RETRYABLE (will retry in a later scheduler run) or
|
||||
* FAILED_FINAL (retry budget exhausted, no further processing).</li>
|
||||
@@ -267,7 +269,9 @@ public class DocumentProcessingCoordinator {
|
||||
* <li>If the status is {@code PROPOSAL_READY} → execute the target-copy
|
||||
* finalization without invoking the AI pipeline again.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Otherwise execute the pipeline (extraction + pre-checks + AI naming) and
|
||||
* persist the outcome.</li>
|
||||
* persist the outcome. If the pipeline produced a naming proposal, the
|
||||
* intermediate {@code PROPOSAL_READY} attempt is persisted and the
|
||||
* target-copy finalization is executed within the same run.</li>
|
||||
* </ol>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param candidate the source document candidate; must not be null
|
||||
@@ -715,6 +719,18 @@ public class DocumentProcessingCoordinator {
|
||||
// New document path
|
||||
// =========================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Processes a brand-new document: persists the pipeline attempt and master record,
|
||||
* then — if the pipeline produced a naming proposal — immediately continues with
|
||||
* the target-copy finalization within the same run.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* The intermediate {@link ProcessingStatus#PROPOSAL_READY} state is always persisted
|
||||
* as a historised attempt before finalization, preserving the invariant that the
|
||||
* leading source for the naming proposal is the most recent {@code PROPOSAL_READY}
|
||||
* attempt in the history.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return true if processing and persistence succeeded, false if a persistence failure occurred
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private boolean processAndPersistNewDocument(
|
||||
SourceDocumentCandidate candidate,
|
||||
DocumentFingerprint fingerprint,
|
||||
@@ -725,14 +741,36 @@ public class DocumentProcessingCoordinator {
|
||||
Instant now = Instant.now();
|
||||
ProcessingOutcomeTransition.ProcessingOutcome outcome = mapOutcomeForNewDocument(pipelineOutcome);
|
||||
DocumentRecord newRecord = buildNewDocumentRecord(fingerprint, candidate, outcome, now);
|
||||
return persistAttemptAndRecord(candidate, fingerprint, context, attemptStart, now, outcome,
|
||||
boolean persistedOk = persistAttemptAndRecord(candidate, fingerprint, context, attemptStart, now, outcome,
|
||||
pipelineOutcome, txOps -> txOps.createDocumentRecord(newRecord));
|
||||
|
||||
// If the pipeline yielded a naming proposal and the intermediate state was persisted
|
||||
// successfully, continue with the target-copy finalization within the same run.
|
||||
// The freshly persisted PROPOSAL_READY attempt is the authoritative source for the
|
||||
// finalization step — no new AI call is triggered.
|
||||
if (persistedOk && outcome.overallStatus() == ProcessingStatus.PROPOSAL_READY) {
|
||||
return finalizeProposalReady(candidate, fingerprint, newRecord, context, attemptStart);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return persistedOk;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// =========================================================================
|
||||
// Known processable document path (non-PROPOSAL_READY)
|
||||
// =========================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Processes a known document whose persisted status is not yet {@code PROPOSAL_READY}:
|
||||
* persists the pipeline attempt and updated master record, then — if the pipeline
|
||||
* produced a naming proposal — immediately continues with the target-copy finalization
|
||||
* within the same run.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* The intermediate {@link ProcessingStatus#PROPOSAL_READY} state is always persisted
|
||||
* as a historised attempt before finalization, preserving the invariant that the
|
||||
* leading source for the naming proposal is the most recent {@code PROPOSAL_READY}
|
||||
* attempt in the history.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return true if processing and persistence succeeded, false if a persistence failure occurred
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private boolean processAndPersistKnownDocument(
|
||||
SourceDocumentCandidate candidate,
|
||||
DocumentFingerprint fingerprint,
|
||||
@@ -745,8 +783,17 @@ public class DocumentProcessingCoordinator {
|
||||
ProcessingOutcomeTransition.ProcessingOutcome outcome =
|
||||
mapOutcomeForKnownDocument(pipelineOutcome, existingRecord.failureCounters());
|
||||
DocumentRecord updatedRecord = buildUpdatedDocumentRecord(existingRecord, candidate, outcome, now);
|
||||
return persistAttemptAndRecord(candidate, fingerprint, context, attemptStart, now, outcome,
|
||||
boolean persistedOk = persistAttemptAndRecord(candidate, fingerprint, context, attemptStart, now, outcome,
|
||||
pipelineOutcome, txOps -> txOps.updateDocumentRecord(updatedRecord));
|
||||
|
||||
// If the pipeline yielded a naming proposal and the intermediate state was persisted
|
||||
// successfully, continue with the target-copy finalization within the same run.
|
||||
// The freshly persisted PROPOSAL_READY attempt is the authoritative source for the
|
||||
// finalization step — no new AI call is triggered.
|
||||
if (persistedOk && outcome.overallStatus() == ProcessingStatus.PROPOSAL_READY) {
|
||||
return finalizeProposalReady(candidate, fingerprint, updatedRecord, context, attemptStart);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return persistedOk;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// =========================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
+6
-6
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ public final class TargetFilenameBuildingService {
|
||||
* <ul>
|
||||
* <li>Resolved date must be non-null.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Validated title must be non-null and non-blank.</li>
|
||||
* <li>Validated title must not exceed 20 characters (before Windows cleaning).</li>
|
||||
* <li>Validated title must not exceed 60 characters (before Windows cleaning).</li>
|
||||
* <li>After Windows-character cleaning, title must contain only letters, digits, and spaces.</li>
|
||||
* </ul>
|
||||
* If any rule is violated, the state is treated as an
|
||||
@@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ public final class TargetFilenameBuildingService {
|
||||
* Windows compatibility: Windows-incompatible characters
|
||||
* (e.g., {@code < > : " / \ | ? *}) are removed from the title before final validation.
|
||||
* This ensures the resulting filename can be created on Windows systems.
|
||||
* The 20-character rule is applied to the original title before cleaning.
|
||||
* The 60-character rule is applied to the original title before cleaning.
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* The 20-character limit applies exclusively to the base title. A duplicate-avoidance
|
||||
* The 60-character limit applies exclusively to the base title. A duplicate-avoidance
|
||||
* suffix (e.g., {@code (1)}) may be appended by the target folder adapter after this
|
||||
* method returns and is not counted against the 20 characters.
|
||||
* method returns and is not counted against the 60 characters.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param proposalAttempt the leading {@code PROPOSAL_READY} attempt; must not be null
|
||||
* @return a {@link BaseFilenameReady} with the complete filename, or an
|
||||
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ public final class TargetFilenameBuildingService {
|
||||
"Leading PROPOSAL_READY attempt has no validated title");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (title.length() > 20) {
|
||||
if (title.length() > 60) {
|
||||
return new InconsistentProposalState(
|
||||
"Leading PROPOSAL_READY attempt has title exceeding 20 characters: '"
|
||||
"Leading PROPOSAL_READY attempt has title exceeding 60 characters: '"
|
||||
+ title + "'");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user